Keywords
Learning
A learning organization
Competencies Aprendizaje
Organización que aprende
Competencias
A learning organization
Competencies Aprendizaje
Organización que aprende
Competencias
How to Cite
Tromp, L., & Orcasitas, M. (2016). Knowledge Management in Organizational Learning. Renovat: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Social Sciences, Technology and Innovation, (1), 11–21. Retrieved from https://revistas.sena.edu.co/index.php/rnt/article/view/484
Abstract
The objective of this article is to analyze knowledge management in organizational learning, whose purpose is to assure the relevant assimilation of knowing for the appropriate performance of human talent in its work areas. It is based on the criteria of Spencer (1996), Don Tapscott (2001), Nonaka (1994) and Verheggen & Cor (2012), among others. To achieve this purpose, a documentary, descriptive study was made in order to determine that learning in organizations implies that people have a sense of what is public, as-sume ethical positions, respect differences, promote participation and innovation, to finally achieve performance in community, contributing to the construction of a differential society. Seen this way, the study considers developing organizations that contribute directly to learning management, since this is dependent on knowledge and is utilized by people to develop their creativity. Likewise, it depends on the situation that occurs, even though it is influenced by motivational and cognitive elements that depend on the individual needs of the involved parties. In this sense, learning management is consecrated as a fundamental element of organizational development.References
Argyris, C. (1999). Sobre el aprendizaje organizacional. México: Oxford. Brown, S., Collins, A., & Duguid P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, V.18.
Del Río, P., & Álvarez, A. (1995). Tossing, praying and reasoning: The changing architectures of mind and agency. En J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Río, & A. Álvarez (Eds.). Sociocultural studies of mind
Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. [Trad. cast. en la mente sociocultural. Madrid: Fundación Infancia y Aprendizaje, 1997].
Don Tapscott (2001). The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril In The Age of Networked Intelligence. McGraw-Hill. México. Durand, G. (1996). Introduction à la mythodologie. Mythes et sociétés, París. Albin Michel.
Easterby-Smith, M (1997). Disciplines of organizational learning: Contributions and critiques. Human Relations, Vol. 50.
Elkjaer, B. (1999). In search of a social learning theory. In M. Easterby-Smith, L. Araujo & J. Burgoyne (Eds.), Organizational Learning and the Learning Organisation. Developments in Theory and Practice. London: Sage.
Finger, M. y Brand, B. (1999). The concept of the “learning organization” applied to the transformation of the public sector in M. Easterby-Smith, L. Araujo and J. Burgoyne (eds.). Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization. London: Sage. Año 1 Nº 1 (Julio -Diciembre, 2014), pp. 11 -21
Grant, M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, Volume 17, Issue 7.
Knowles, M., Holton E. & Swanson R. (2001). Andragogía: El aprendizaje de los adultos. México: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science.
Porter, L., Lawler, E. & Hackman, J. (1975). Behavior in Organization. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.
Spencer, A. (1996). Phonology: theory and description. Oxford & Cambridge, Mass. Blackwell Publishers.
Teece, D. (1998). Economic Performance and the Theory of the Firm.Edward Elgar Publishing.
Verheggen, T. & Cor, B. (2012). We Don’t Share. The Social Representation Approach, Enactivism and the Ground for an Intrinsically Social Psychology. Culture & Psychology.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
