Quantifying Carbon Footprint at Agroindustrial Training Center La Angostura
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

GHG (Greenhouse gases)
CO2-eq. GEI (Gases Efecto Invernadero)
CO2 equivalente.

How to Cite

Rodríguez Guzmán, Y., & Moreno O., Y. D. (2016). Quantifying Carbon Footprint at Agroindustrial Training Center La Angostura. Revista Agropecuaria Y Agroindustrial La Angostura, 3(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.23850/raaa.v3i1.464

Abstract

The growing international concern about the adverse consequences of climate change, has motivated various organizations and institutions to take steps to fully understand their dynamics of greenhouse gases (GHGs). (Schneider & Samaniego, 2010. 100, 5). One of the internationally recognized indicators to understand the dynamics of GHG is carbon footprint obtained by quantifying GHG emissions caused by the activities of an individual, organization or institution, over a period of time. This unit is expressed in tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-eq,) where the unit tons of CO2 reflects the amount of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere. The quantification of tons of CO2-eq at Agroindustrial Training Center La Angostura (CEFA) was performed by identifying study areas and process maps; variables were established; consumption or production according to the analyzed variables were quantified; and the equivalent in CO2-eq units was estimated. Twenty four production units as study areas were identified - divided into 4 productive areas of the Center: agricultural area, livestock area, marketing area and environmental area. Based on the different process maps and the methodology, the four identified variables were: energy consumption, water consumption, fuel consumption and generation of solid waste. With these variables in mind, the consolidated consumption or production established that GHG emissions in the Training Center are 42,827.34 tons of CO2-eq approached over a period of one year, between 01/03/2015 and 01/03/2016. Knowing the impact of the activities of the CEFA Organization regarding the amount of GHG in the production units remarks on the critical points to be resolved in a clear and efficient manner.
https://doi.org/10.23850/raaa.v3i1.464
PDF (Español (España))

References

Baethgen, W. & Martino, D. (2001). Emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero en los sectores agropecuario y forestal del Uruguay y oportunidades en el mercado de carbono. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal, 9(2), 127-134.

Espíndola, C., & Valderrama, J. O. (2012). Huella del carbono. Parte 2: La visión de las empresas, los cuestionamientos y el futuro. Información tecnológica, 23(1), 177-192.

Frohmann, A., Mulder, N., Olmos, X., & Herreros, S. (2012). Huella de carbono y exportaciones de alimentos: Guía práctica, 108.

Higuera, P. J. R., & Caicedo, J. D. P. (2002). Flujos de dióxido de carbono entre el océano y la atmósfera en las áreas marítimas colombianas durante el período 1998-2001.

Linares y Pintos. (2013). Los efectos económicos del sistema europeo de comercio de emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero Nº 237.

Penela, A. C., Negro, M. D. C. G., & Quesada, J. L. D. (2009). El MC3 una alternativa metodológica para estimar la huella corporativa del carbono (HCC). DELOS: Desarrollo Local Sostenible, 2(5), 3.

Schneider, H., & Samaniego, J. (2009). La huella del carbono en la producción, distribución y consumo de bienes y servicios. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

Samaniego, J., & Schneider, H. (2010). La huella del carbono en la producción, distribución y consumo de bienes y servicios, 100.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Agropecuaria y Agroindustrial La Angostura

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.