Abstract
There was evaluated the nutritional composition of the Hay of Foliage of Yucca, (HFY) (Manihot esculenta Crantz), var. MPER183, with base in the comparison of two (2) methods of Dried: natural, (ND) and Artificial, (AD). In each of them, there were in use two (2) loads (charges) of Green Foliage (GF) (7.5 and 15.0 K.m-2) and three (3) cutting frequencies. The FV was harvested every 14 days, starting at 16 and 18 weeks for the ND and the AD respectively. The content of dampness was evaluated from 0 to 48 hours in the ND and in the AD, every two hours (0 at 8 hours). The AD realized in a dryer of fixed cap divided in compartments that it works which generates warm air forced to (40°C), using for it, an engine driven with propane as combustible gas. There measured the Dry Matter (MS) to 60°C for 48 hours. The contents of dampness, of nutritional composition, and of hydrocyanic acid (HCN). Were analyzed by statistical models of differentiated variance analysis, according to the processes in evaluation, by means of randomized completely design by different arrangements each one. The results indicated the dried method,load and cutting frequency did not affect significantly the nutritional composition of the HFY. In agreement to the results of variance analysis between the dried methods and with the exception of the MS, significantly differences did not observe for the variables organic matter (OM), crude protein (PC), detergent neutral fiber (DNF), detergent acid fiber (DAF), hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. For the AD, the total and liberated HCN was higher in relation than the ND. The unitary costs of production for K of HFY, were 61.5 %, major with the AD (COP. $ 221), in relation with the ND (COP. $ 136).
Para citar este artículo
Hernández, E. y Ramírez, L. (2016). Evaluación de dos métodos de secado sobre la composición nutricional del heno de follaje de yuca (Manihot esculenta Crantz.). Rev. Colomb. Investig. Agroindustriales, 3(1), 83-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23850/24220582.420References
AOAC (1990). Official methods of analysis of the association of oficial analitical chemists. 15th Ed., Arlington, Virginia, USA. p.771. https://law.resource.org/pub/us/cfr/ibr/002/aoac.methods.1.1990.pdf.
Calsamiglia, S. (1997). Nuevas bases para la utilización de la fibra en dietas de rumiantes. XIII Curso de especialización FEDNA. Madrid, España. p.150.
CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical).(2002).Mejoramiento genético de la yuca en CIAT. La yuca una materia prima competitiva para la industria y una fuente confiable de ingresos para el agricultor. http://www.clayucacr.org/docs/ivcongreso/12-mejoramientogeneticoyuca.pdf.
Devendra, C. (1977). Cassava as a feed source for ruminants En: Nestel, B. y Grahem. M (eds). Cassava as animal feed of a workshop held at the University of GUELPH. International Development. Research Centre. Ottawa. Canada. pp.107-119. http://www.sidalc.net/cgi-bin/wxis.exe/?IsisScript=catalco.
ost&formato=2&cantidad=1&expresion=mfn=042086.
López, A.J., Albán, T. A. A., Pérez, C. S. & Becerra, J. J. (2008). Variedades de yuca para producir forraje en tres regiones de Colombia. Cartilla divulgativa. Corpoica. http://corpomail.corpoica.org.co/BACFILES/BACDIGITAL/55390/publicacin.pdf.
Essers, S.A., Bosveld, M., Van Grift, R. & Voragen, A. (1993). Studies on the quantification of specific cyanogens in cassava products and introduction of a new chromogen. J Sci Food Agri, 63 (3), 287 – 296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740630305
García, A., Gallego, S. & Lisimaco, A. (2006). Establecimiento de una planta piloto para producción continua de harina refinada de yuca. http://ciatlibrary.ciat.cgiar.org/articulos_ciat/Digital/SB211.
C3_G373_Establecimiento_de_una_planta_piloto_
para_producci%C3%B3n_continua_de_harina_refinada.pdf.
Gil, J. & Cadavid, L.F. (2006). Investigación en producción de yuca forrajera en Colombia. (CIAT). http://www.sian.info.ve/porcinos/eventos/clayuca0102/luis.htm.
Kjeldahl, J. (1883). Neue Methode zur Bestimmung der Stickstoffs in organischen Korpern. Z Anal Chem, 22, 366-382.
López, J.A., Albán, T. A., Pérez, C.S. & Becerra, J.J. (2008). Variedades de yuca para producir forraje en tres regiones de Colombia. Cartilla divulgativa. Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (CORPOICA), Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Consorcio Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Apoyo a la Investigación y al desarrollo de la yuca (CLAYUCA). http://corpomail.corpoica.org.co/
BACFILES/BACDIGITAL/55390/publicacin.pdf.
Ospina, B. & Ceballos, H. (2002). La yuca en el tercer milenio sistemas modernos de producción, procesamiento, utilización y comercialización. CLAYUCA. CIAT .
Ramírez, N.L.M., Ipaz, C.C.M. & Jiménez, P.A.(2007). Yuca Manihot esculenta Crantz; alternativa forrajera para el desarrollo sostenible de sistemas de producción ganadera en el trópico. Manual técnico. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Departamento de Ciencia Animal. Palmira, Colombia.
Wanapat, M., Pimpa, O., Petlum, A. & Boontao, A. (1997). Cassava hay: a new strategic feed for ruminants during the dry season. In: Better use of locally available feed resources in sustainable livestock based agricultural systems in SE Asia. FAO Regional Project. GCP/RAS/143/JPN (Phnom Penh, Cambodia).