Keywords
textiles
pollutants
allergies
spectrophotometry UV / Vis
free formaldehyde
OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 textiles
contaminantes
alergias
espectrofotometría Ultravioleta/Visible
formaldehído libre
OEKO-TEX® Standard 100.
pollutants
allergies
spectrophotometry UV / Vis
free formaldehyde
OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 textiles
contaminantes
alergias
espectrofotometría Ultravioleta/Visible
formaldehído libre
OEKO-TEX® Standard 100.
How to Cite
Caro Zapata, A. C., Gómez Rave, N. A., & Aguiar Santa, J. (2018). Validation of an analytical method by UV / VIS spectrophotometry for quantification of free formaldehyde in textiles and application in the analysis of clothes traded in the colombian market. Informador Tecnico, 82(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.23850/22565035.938
Abstract
Formaldehyde has been reported as a carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has also been reported that low levels of formaldehyde can cause irritation to skin, eyes, nose. Formaldehyde is used as a component in resins, on cotton fabrics as wrinkle resistance and shape retention. In the colombian textile market, this type
of toxic substances are not controlled. In this research article an analytical method was validated by UV spectrophotometry Visible for detection and quantification of free formaldehyde in cotton, for which an analytical method was adopted, referenced ISO 14184-1: 2011and the results were: the correlation coefficient of 0,99991 indicates that the method is linear,
it was also observed that the analytical method has the capacity to recover 99,34% ± 0,941% of the formaldehyde content in cotton textiles, the coefficient of variation of 0.354983% indicates the reproducibility of the method, whose limits of detection and quantification were 0,4073 mg / L and 1,358 mg / L of free formaldehyde respectively. In the tests on samples
commercialized in the Colombian market, formaldehyde was quantified in 46 of the 62 samples analyzed.
References
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (1999). Formaldehido (Cas # 50-00-0). Recuperado de https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ es/toxfaqs/es_tfacts111.pdf
Araque, L. G., Casas, J. P., y Herrera, D. A. (2013). Caracterización de la exposición ocupacional a formaldehído en trabajadores del sector salud y educación en Colombia 2004-2013 (Tesis de Maestría). Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Cohen, D., Hatch, K. L., Maibach, H., y Pratt, M. (2001). Clothes Make the (Wo)man: Diagnosis and Management of Clothing Dermatitis. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis, 12(4), 229–231. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01634989-200112000-00012
de Freitas Rezende, F. B., de Souza Santos Cheibub, A. M., Pereira Netto, A. D., y de Carvalho Marques, F. F (2017). Determination of formaldehyde in bovine milk using a high sensitivity HPLC-UV method. Microchemical Journal, 134, 383–389. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2017.07.003
De Groot, A. C., y Maibach, H. I. (2010). Does allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde in clothes treated with durable-press chemical finishes exist in the USA? Contact Dermatitis, 62(3), 127–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01581.x
Fisher, A. A., Kanof, N. B., y Biondi, E. M. (1962). Free formaldehyde in textiles and paper: Clinical significance. Archives of Dermatology, 86(6), 753–756. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1962.01590120051008
Fregert, S., Dahlquist, I., y Gruvberger, B. (1984). A simple method for the detection of formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis, 10(3), 132–134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1984.tb00017.x
Frosch, J., Menné, T., y Lepoittevin, J. P. (Eds.). (2006). Contact Dermatitis (4th ed.). Heidelberg,Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31301-X
García-Gavín, J., Armario-Hita, J. C., Fernández-Redondo, V., Fernández-Vozmediano, J. M., Sánchez-Pérez, J., Silvestre, J. F., Uter, W., y Giménez-Arnau, A. M. (2011). Epidemiología del eczema de contacto en España. Resultados de la Red Española de Vigilancia en Alergia de Contacto (REVAC) durante el año 2008. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas, 102(2), 98-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2010.10.015
Gryllaki-Berger, M., Mugny, C., Perrenoud, D., Pannather, A., y Frenk, E. (1992). A comparative study of formaldehyde detection using chromotropic acid, acetylacetone and HPLC in cosmetics and household cleaning products. Contact Dermatitis, 26(3), 149–154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00284.x
Guideline, I. H. T. (2005, November). Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2 (R1). In International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva, Switzerland (pp. 11-12).
International Organization for Standardization, T. (2011). Determination of Formaldehyde – Part 1: Free and Hydrolysed Formaldehyde (water extraction method). ISO 14184-1.
Kawakami, Y., Maruo, Y. Y., Nakagawa, T., y Saito, H. (2015). A screening method for detecting formaldehyde emitted from textile products. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 62, 41–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.005
Latorre, N., Silvestre, J. F., y Monteagudo, A. F. (2011). Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition), 102(2), 86–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1578-2190(11)70765-X
Lazarov, A. (2004). Textile dermatitis in patients with contact sensitization in Israel: A 4-year prospective study. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 18(5), 531–537. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.00967.x
Lazarov, A., Trattner, A., Abraham, D., y David, M. (2002). Frequency of textile dye and resin sensitization in patients with contact dermatitis in Israel. Contact Dermatitis, 46(2), 119–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460217.x
Marks Jr, J. G., Belsito, D. V., DeLeo, V. A., Fowler Jr, J. F., Fransway, A. F., Maibach, H. I., ... y Storrs, F. J. (2000). North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch-Test Results, 1996-1998. Archives of Dermatology, 136(2), 272–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.136.2.272
Marks, J. J., Belsito, D. V., DeLeo, V. A., Fowler, J. F., Fransway, A. F., Maibach, H. I., ... y Storrs, F. J. (2003). North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis : Official Journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society, 14(2), 59–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01634989-200306000-00002
OEKO TEX. (2016). Limit values and fastness. doi: https://doi.org/10.2115/fiber.65.P_225
Peng, H., Yang, C. Q., y Wang, S. (2012). Nonformaldehyde durable press finishing of cotton fabrics using the combination of maleic acid and sodium hypophosphite. Carbohydrate Polymers, 87(1), 491–499. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.013
Piccinini, P., Senaldi, C., y Summa, C. (2007). European survey on the release of formaldehyde from textiles. Recuperado de: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC36150/6150%20-%20 HCHO_survey_final_report.pdf
Pratt, M. D., Belsito, D. V., DeLeo, V. A., Fowler, J. F., Fransway, A. F., Maibach, H. I., … y Sherertz, E. F. (2004). North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis, 15(4), 176–183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200412000-00003
Scheman, A., Jacob, S., Zirwas, M., Warshaw, E., Nedorost, S., Katta, R., Cook, J., Castanedo-Tardan, M. P. (2008). Contact Allergy: Alternatives for the 2007 North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) Standard Screening Tray. Disease-a-Month, 54(1–2), 7–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disamonth.2007.10.002
Schindler, W. D. y Hauser, P. J. (2004). Chemical finishing of textiles. New York, USA:CRC Press LLC. Recuperado de: https://books.google.es/s?hl=es&lr=&id=S42kAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=textile+processes+and+chemical+agents&ots=u0N7GkkR5A&sig=TFkPLs3yczinvKyUZLIhsHLq9ok#v=onepage&q=textile processes and chemical agents&f=false
Standard, J. I. (2011). Methods for Resin Finished Textiles. JIS L1041.
States y Accountability, G. (2010). Formaldehyde in while levels in clothing generally appear to be low , allergic contact dermatitis is a health issue for some people h ighlights, (august).
Wahed, P., Razzaq, M. A., Dharmapuri, S., y Corrales, M. (2016). Determination of formaldehyde in food and feed by an in-house validated HPLC method. Food Chemistry, 202, 476–483. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.01.136
Warshaw, E. M., Belsito, D. V., DeLeo, V. A., Fowler Jr., J. F., Maibach, H. I., Marks, J. y Storrs, F. J. (2008). North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2003-2004 study period. Dermatitis, 19(3), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2007.06060
Yao, W., Wang, B., Ye, T., y Yang, Y. (2013). Durable press finishing of cotton fabrics with citric acid: Enhancement of whiteness and wrinkle recovery by polyol extenders. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(46), 16118–16127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie402747x
Zug, K. A., Warshaw, E. M., Fowler, J. F., Maibach, H. I., Belsito, D. L., Pratt, M. D., … y DeLeo, V. A. (2009). Patch-test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006. Dermatitis, 20(3), 149–160.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
